CAEP Annual Reporting Measures

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) Annual Reporting Measures 圖朸厙s education programs prepare teachers, counselors, and educational leaders with a strong grounding in their disciplines, commitment to meet the needs of all PreK12 students and their communities, and rich practical experience in schools. Our education programs are committed to leveraging candidate and program outcome data to inform our continuous improvement efforts.泭

Measure 1: Completer Effectiveness (Initial Licensure): 1) completer impact in contributing to PreK-12 student learning growth AND 2) completer effectiveness in applying professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions. CAEP Standard R4.1.

Because Virginia does not provide teacher or student performance data to education preparation programs (EPP), Virginia schools and universities of education have collaborated on coordinated data collection from program completers to fill this gap. The Virginia Education Assessment Collaborative (VEAC) was developed to develop instrumentation and coordinate data collection across participating EPPS. The initial licensure completer and employer surveys were developed in alignment with both the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) core teaching standards and the Virginia Uniform Performance Standards (VUPS). The surveys use the same 15 items to permit comparison of completer self-report and employer ratings. This survey provides valuable data about the perceptions of completers about their preparation experience and their ability to apply the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions taught in their preparation programs.

Our response rates have been low (10% in 2020-21, 8% in 2021-22, and 12% in 2022-23). This is in part reflects challenges with access to updated completer contact information, which became more challenging with the departure of a key VDOE employee responsible for providing EPPs with data about where in VA our completers are working. VDOE has now resume providing that data in winter 2023-24. That was not in time to support our data collection for the 2022-23 cycle, but will be helpful to support our data collection efforts in future cycles. Because our response rate is lower than that of our peers, we have reviewed our practices and developed new strategies for increasing response rates. We have created an online portal linked to our licensure verification form that will enable us to collect completer emails and current employment information (including those outside of Virginia). This will better enable us to remain connected to our completers as they enter the workforce. In addition, we continue to communicate the value of completer feedback in guiding our ongoing improvement efforts.泭

In addition to data collected through the VEAC consortium, we are in discussion with our school communities to begin collecting data on our completers instructional effectiveness.

Completer Impact

Although student-level performance data are not currently available, Item G on the completer and employer satisfaction surveys: Work results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress informs the question of completer impact on PreK-12 student learning growth. As summarized in Table 1 below, in 2022-23 completers reported a mean rating of 3.25 (proficient). Their employers rated our completers slightly higher (3.29). 圖朸厙s ratings are comparable to those of the other 31 participating Virginia EPPs, with a VEAC completer mean of 3.28 and VEAC employer mean of 3.24. Although the low n limits extrapolation to completers overall, the high ratings by both completers and their employers indicates that our completers are engaging in practices that are yielding positive, measurable impacts on student learning. We will continue to evaluate these data to monitor trends and identify areas for improvement. By collecting division-level teacher effectiveness data in future cycles we anticipate being able to provide more granular data to inform completer impact.

Table 1: VEAC Completer & Employer Item G: Completer Impact

Rating Scale 1-4 (1: unacceptable; 4: exemplary)

2020-21

2021-22

2022-23

EPP

VEAC

EPP

VEAC

EPP

VEAC

G: Engaging in practices that results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress.

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.3
N: 120

Completer
Mean: 3.27
N: 1,368
Employer
Mean: 3.32
N: 1,324

Completer
Mean: 3.38
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.23
N: 101

Completer
Mean: 3.24
N: 863
Employer
Mean: 3.23
N: 1,087

Completer
Mean: 3.25
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.29
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,079
Employer
Mean: 3.24
N: 1,183

Completer Effectiveness

Completer effectiveness reflects the extent to which the completer has transferred the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions from their preparation experience into their work in the classroom. The VEAC completer and employer surveys described previously reports on aspects of completer performance aligned with InTASC standards and the Virginia Uniform Performance Standards (VUPS). Completers reported high levels of preparedness across all items A-N, with means for all ratings between 3.06-3.50. Their employers also rated completer effectiveness at proficient levels. Completers reported highest levels of preparedness for professional ethics (3.47), reflective practice (3..42), and instructional technologies (3.41). Completers reported lower levels of preparedness for using data to guide instruction and feedback (3.06) and demonstrating subject matter knowledge and the developmental needs of students (3.16). Employers reported highest levels of satisfaction with professional ethics (3.44) and commitment to equity (3.40).

Table 2: VEAC Completer & Employer Survey: Completer Effectiveness

Rating Scale: 1-4 (1: unacceptable; 4: exemplary)

Note: Items I and K were omitted from the 2022-23 survey.

2020-21

2021-22

2022-23

EPP

VEAC

EPP

VEAC

EPP

VEAC

A: Demonstrating your understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences.\

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.34
N: 119

Completer
Mean: 3.31
N: 1,367
Employer
Mean: 3.37
N: 1,328

Completer
Mean: 3.44
N: 57
Employer
Mean: 3.31
N: 102

Completer
Mean: 3.29
N: 865
Employer
Mean: 3.30
N: 1,092

Completer
Mean: 3.16
N: 31
Employer
Mean: 3.40
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.30
N: 1,079
Employer
Mean: 3.27
N: 1,185

B: Planning using state standards, the school's curriculum, engaging and research-based strategies and resources, and data to meet the needs of all students.

Completer
Mean: 3.24
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.33
N: 119

Completer
Mean: 3.25
N: 1,359
Employer
Mean:3.35
N: 1,326

Completer
Mean: 3.41
N: 56
Employer
Mean: 3.23
N: 101

Completer
Mean: 3.20
N: 859
Employer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,090

Completer
Mean: 3.26
N: 31
Employer
Mean: 3.29
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.24
N: 1,070
Employer
Mean: 3.25
N: 1,183

C: Effectively engaging students in learning by using a variety of research-based instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs.

Completer
Mean: 3.35
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.33
N: 119

Completer
Mean: 3.37
N: 1,371
Employer
Mean: 3.36
N: 1,328

Completer
Mean: 3.44
N: 55
Employer
Mean: 3.28
N: 102

Completer
Mean: 3.30
N: 864
Employer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,092

Completer
Mean: 3.23
N: 31
Employer
Mean: 3.27
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.23
N: 1,076
Employer
Mean: 3.21
N: 1,184

D: Systematically gathering, analyzing, and using all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to students, parents, caregivers, and other educators.

Completer
Mean: 3.20
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.19
N: 119

Completer
Mean: 3.13
N: 1,367
Employer
Mean: 3.22
N: 1,321

Completer
Mean: 3.31
N: 55
Employer
Mean: 3.21
N: 98

Completer
Mean: 3.06
N: 858
Employer
Mean: 3.17
N: 1,079

Completer
Mean: 3.06
N: 31
Employer
Mean: 3.20
N: 69

Completer
Mean: 3.06
N: 1,071
Employer
Mean: 3.15
N: 1,179

E: Using resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning.

Completer
Mean: 3.46
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.36
N: 119

Completer
Mean: 3.49
N: 1,371
Employer
Mean: 3.44
N: 1,330

Completer
Mean: 3.50
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.27
N: 102

Completer
Mean: 3.39
N: 866
Employer
Mean: 3.30
N: 1,090

Completer
Mean: 3.12
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.31
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.38
N: 1,080
Employer
Mean: 3.38
N: 1,187

F: Maintaining a commitment to professional ethics, collaborating and communicating effectively, and taking responsibility for and participating in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning.

Completer
Mean: 3.46
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.42
N: 121

Completer
Mean: 3.59
N: 1,369
Employer
Mean: 3.48
N: 1,330

Completer
Mean: 3.60
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.36
N: 102

Completer
Mean: 3.56
N: 864
Employer
Mean: 3.36
N: 1,091

Completer
Mean: 3.47
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.44
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.49
N: 1,081
Employer
Mean: 3.36
N: 1,187

IG: Engaging in practices that results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress.

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.3
N: 120

Completer
Mean: 3.27
N: 1,368
Employer
Mean: 3.32
N: 1,324

Completer
Mean: 3.38
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.23
N: 101

Completer
Mean: 3.24
N: 863
Employer
Mean: 3.23
N: 1,087

Completer
Mean: 3.25
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.29
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,079
Employer
Mean: 3.24
N: 1,183

H: Selects technologies, informed by research, to promote learning for all students.

Completer
Mean: 3.15
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.33
N: 121

Completer
Mean: 3.27
N: 1,364
Employer
Mean:3.37
N: 1,325

Completer
Mean: 3.41
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.26
N: 100

Completer
Mean: 3.23
N: 861
Employer
Mean: 3.26
N: 1,074

Completer
Mean: 3.41
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.37
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,076
Employer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,179

J: Demonstrating a commitment to equity by providing instructional practices and classroom strategies that result in culturally inclusive and responsive learning environments and academic achievement for all students.

Completer
Mean: 3.24
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.31
N: 121

Completer
Mean: 3.30
N: 1,366
Employer
Mean: 3.31
N: 121

Completer
Mean: 3.39
N: 57
Employer
Mean: 3.23
N: 101

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 861
Employer
Mean: 3.24
N: 1,074

Completer
Mean: 3.50
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.40
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.38
N: 1,078
Employer
Mean: 3.33
N: 1,177

L: Collaborating with the learning community (e.g. school personnel, caregivers, and volunteers) to meet the needs of all learners and contribute to a supportive culture.

Completer
Mean: 3.28
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.34
N: 121

Completer
Mean: 3.32
N: 1,366
Employer
Mean: 3.40
N: 1,328

Completer
Mean: 3.40
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.29
N: 102

Completer
Mean: 3.29
N: 865
Employer
Mean: 3.30
N: 1,090

Completer
Mean: 3.31
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.34
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.24
N: 1,075
Employer
Mean: 3.34
N: 1,185

M: Using assessment results to inform and adjust practice.

Completer
Mean: 3.26
N: 46
Employer
Mean:3.24
N: 118

Completer
Mean: 3.27
N: 1,364
Employer
Mean: 3.29
N: 1,321

Completer
Mean: 3.26
N: 57
Employer
Mean: 3.22
N: 97

Completer
Mean: 3.23
N: 861
Employer
Mean: 3.21
N: 1,079

Completer
Mean: 3.34
N: 32
Employer
Mean: 3.26
N: 68

Completer
Mean: 3.19
N: 1,070
Employer
Mean: 3.20
N: 1,176

N: Engaging in reflection on the impact of their teaching practice and adapts to meet the needs of each learner.

Completer
Mean: 3.33
N: 46
Employer
Mean: 3.27
N: 120

Completer
Mean: 3.42
N: 1,368
Employer
Mean: 3.29
N: 1,322

Completer
Mean: 3.40
N: 58
Employer
Mean: 3.27
N: 102

Completer
Mean: 3.39
N: 874
Employer
Mean: 3.28
N: 1,079

Completer
Mean: 3.42
N: 31
Employer
Mean: 3.31
N: 70

Completer
Mean: 3.33
N: 1,076
Employer
Mean: 3.22
N: 1,183

Employer satisfaction with program completers and stakeholder involvement. CAEP Standards R4.2, RA4.1, R5.3, and RA5.3

Initial Licensure

As demonstrated in the rating of completer effectiveness reported in Measure 1, 圖朸厙s initial licensure employers have rated completers working in their schools at the proficient level across all items. In addition, employers were asked to respond to the following prompt: based on your experience with this teacher, what best describes the extent to which they were ready to meet the needs of your students in your school? Employers have rated 圖朸厙 completers highly, with a mean of 4.41 (mostly ready (able to successfully meet the needs of most students).

Table 3: VEAC Employer Survey: Satisfaction

Rating scale 1-5 (1: not ready (unable to meet the needs of students even with additional supports) - 5: fully ready (able to have an immediate impact on student learning)

2021-22

2022-23

EPP

VEAC

EPP

VEAC

Based on your experience with this teacher, what best describes the extent to which they were ready to meet the needs of your students in your school

Mean: 4.36
N: 103

Mean: 4.43
N: 1,100

Mean: 4.41
N: 71

Mean: 4.33
N: 1,208

Advanced Licensure

In 圖朸厙s four advanced licensure programs (school leadership, reading specialist, math specialist, and school counseling), programs have relied primarily on feedback from advisory board members and key school and division partners. 圖朸厙 has begun participating in VEACs advanced licensure survey of completers and employers, and we anticipate reporting the first cycle of data in 2024-25. Our programs continue to meet regularly with their school and district partner stakeholders to discuss program developments and to seek feedback about their programs. Some examples include:

  • School Counseling: a survey asked employers to provide an overall assessment of the graduates ability as a counselor, on a scale ranging from 1 (harmful) to 5 (exceeds). All 5 respondents rated their 圖朸厙 school counselor completers at the 5 (exceeds) level.
  • Math Specialist: This program is cohort-based in partnership with 2 school districts. Both partners rated their satisfaction with the program preparation highly. They noted the convenience and quality of the online instructional environment and noted that the mat specialist completers entered their work ready for their roles. They provided constructive feedback that is informing ongoing programmatic improvement:
    • Provide increased support to prepare secondary teachers to adapt successfully to the elementary environment
    • Add cotaught courses to include a math content professor and teacher education pedagogy expert
    • Add professional interview module to better prepare completers for entering the professional market in their new roles (district offered to provide their administrative personnel to participate in mock interviews)
    • Provide additional information to practicum supervisor to strengthen connections between coursework and field experience.

Stakeholder Involvement

Initial Licensure Programs

圖朸厙 actively engages our school and division partners in many aspects of our program design, evaluation, and innovation development. Some notable examples include:

  • Paid Teacher Residencies: using funds from the Virginia Department of Education 圖朸厙 continues to partner with several school divisions in the Hampton Roads region (Southeast VA) to provide rigorous, year-long paid residencies to prepare special education and STEM teachers for high-need schools. In 2022-23 圖朸厙 partnered with Chesapeake, Newport News, Norfolk, and Virginia Beach Public Schools. This program, which uses a culturally responsive pedagogical framework, places talented aspiring teachers in a classroom where they are mentored and co-teach alongside trained, skilled mentor teachers. By funding tuition, licensure fees, and providing a $20,000 stipend, the program has been successful in recruiting, preparing, and retaining a diverse cadre of skilled teachers. 圖朸厙 works closely with division partners in selecting the teacher residents and placing them in schools, training and supporting mentor teachers, and collaborating across the division and university to ensure a close integration of theory and practice.
  • Cohort-Based Programs: 圖朸厙 partners with seven divisions to prepare specialized cohorts of initial licensure candidates (special education general curriculum, STEM education) and advanced licensure candidates (educational leadership, math specialist, reading specialist). These cohorts are developed to meet the specific priorities and needs of each division context.
  • National Science Foundation Noyce Grant: 圖朸厙 is the recipient of a $1.1 million NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program grant that is funding a partnership with Norfolk Public Schools to develop an innovative grow-your-own program for math and science teachers in high-need communities. This program is focused on identifying, recruiting, and support gifted math and science students to persist through high school and college to prepare to be STEM teachers.

Advanced Licensure Programs

Candidate competency at program completion. CAEP Standards R3.3, and RA3.4.

Initial Licensure Programs 2022-23

  • Number of completers in program leading to initial teacher licensure: 235
  • Completer Licensure Test Pass Rates:
    • Virginia Communication & Literacy Assessment (VCLA): 100%
    • Praxis II subject exams: 100%

Advanced Licensure Programs 2022-23

  • Number of completers in programs leading to advanced teacher licensure: 124
  • Completer Licensure Test Pass Rates:
    • School Leadership Licensure Assessment (Educational Leadership): 100%
    • Reading for Virginia Educators (Reading Specialist): 100%
    • Comprehensive Professional Counseling Exam (School Counseling): 100%

Ability of completers to be hired in education positions for which they have been prepared.

圖朸厙 has historically tracked completer employment data by drawing on 3-year data provided by the Virginia Department of Education. With changes in staffing, those data have been less consistently available and complete over the past several years. This has significantly impacted our ability to track our initial and advanced completers from year-to-year. Further, limitations in state data management and tracking further constrain this analysis. After a multi-year hiatus, we received these data late this year. We are currently tracking our completers to provide more granular data moving forward. In addition, we have built in a data tracking component to get more information from our completers as they are graduating so that we may maintain contact and stay apprised of where they are teaching.